Feedback During Incidents: Turning Downtime and Outages into Improvement Opportunities
How to collect and use feedback during service disruptions. Balance communication, gather impact data, and emerge with stronger customer relationships and clearer priorities.

Summary
Incidents are stressful—for your team and your users. But they're also rare moments when users are intensely focused on your product's value. The feedback collected during and after incidents reveals true priorities, uncovers hidden dependencies, and often creates surprising loyalty when handled well. This guide shows how to collect incident feedback without adding friction, use it to improve, and turn negative experiences into relationship builders.
Why Incident Feedback Matters
Incidents reveal what normal operations hide.
The Unique Value of Incident Feedback
Reveals true dependencies:
- Which workflows break when you're down?
- Which integrations are mission-critical?
- Which users have no workaround?
Exposes hidden users:
- Silent users appear when something breaks
- You discover use cases you didn't know existed
- Critical accounts make themselves known
Clarifies priorities:
- Users articulate what they need most
- Impact severity becomes concrete
- Feature importance is stress-tested
The Trust Opportunity
Counterintuitively, incidents can build trust:
| Incident Response | Trust Impact |
|---|---|
| Silent during outage | -40% trust |
| Poor communication | -25% trust |
| Good communication | -5% trust |
| Excellent communication + follow-up | +10% trust |
Users who experience well-handled incidents often become more loyal than those who never experienced issues.
Collecting Feedback During Incidents
Different phases require different approaches.
Phase 1: During the Incident
Goals:
- Acknowledge the issue
- Gather impact data
- Show you're working on it
Status page with impact collection:
[ONGOING] Service Disruption - Dashboard Loading
Started: 2:34 PM EST | Status: Investigating
Affected: Dashboard loading, Report generation
Not affected: API, Data ingestion, Webhooks
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Help us understand the impact:
Are you currently affected?
[Yes, blocking my work] [Yes, inconvenient] [No impact]
What are you trying to do?
[View dashboard] [Generate report] [Other: ___]
[Submit - takes 5 seconds]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Latest update (2:52 PM):
Root cause identified. Deploying fix. ETA: 15 minutes.
In-app incident banner:
const IncidentBanner = ({ incident }) => (
<Banner type="warning">
<Text>We're experiencing issues with {incident.affectedAreas}.</Text>
<Link href="/status">View status</Link>
<Button
size="small"
onClick={() => showImpactSurvey(incident)}
>
Report impact
</Button>
</Banner>
);
Phase 2: Immediately After Resolution
Goals:
- Confirm resolution
- Understand full impact
- Capture while memory is fresh
Resolution notification with survey:
Subject: Resolved: Dashboard was unavailable for 47 minutes
Hi [Name],
The dashboard issue from earlier today has been resolved.
All services are now operating normally.
Duration: 2:34 PM - 3:21 PM EST (47 minutes)
We'd like to understand how this affected you:
→ How significant was the impact? [High] [Medium] [Low] [None]
→ What were you trying to accomplish during the outage?
[Text field]
[Submit feedback - 30 seconds]
We'll share more details in our post-incident report tomorrow.
- The [Company] Team
Phase 3: Post-Incident Review (24-72 hours)
Goals:
- Gather detailed impact
- Collect improvement suggestions
- Close the loop on investigation
Detailed impact survey:
Post-Incident Feedback - Jan 13 Dashboard Outage
Thank you for your patience during yesterday's outage.
We're gathering feedback to improve our reliability.
1. How would you rate our communication during the incident?
[Excellent] [Good] [Okay] [Poor] [Very Poor]
2. What impact did this have on your work?
□ Missed deadline
□ Had to use manual workaround
□ Customer-facing impact
□ Financial impact
□ Just inconvenient
□ No significant impact
3. Is there anything we should have communicated that we didn't?
[Text field]
4. What would help you during future incidents?
□ SMS alerts
□ More frequent updates
□ Estimated time to resolution
□ Technical details
□ Workaround suggestions
□ Other: ___
[Submit feedback]
We'll share our post-incident report including your feedback themes.
Processing Incident Feedback
Transform raw feedback into actionable insights.
Impact Categorization
Categorize reported impacts:
const categorizeImpact = (feedback) => {
return {
severity: calculateSeverity(feedback),
type: categorizeType(feedback.impact),
affectedWorkflow: extractWorkflow(feedback),
businessImpact: assessBusinessImpact(feedback),
};
};
const impactCategories = {
blocking: 'Could not do their job',
degraded: 'Could work but with difficulty',
workaround: 'Found alternative but took extra time',
inconvenient: 'Minor disruption',
none: 'Unaffected',
};
Aggregate Impact Report
Summarize across all feedback:
Incident Impact Summary - Jan 13 Dashboard Outage
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Feedback received: 127 responses
Impact Distribution:
Blocking: ████████░░ 34 users (27%)
Degraded: ██████░░░░ 28 users (22%)
Workaround: ████████░░ 32 users (25%)
Inconvenient: █████░░░░░ 23 users (18%)
None: ██░░░░░░░░ 10 users (8%)
Affected Workflows:
1. End-of-day reporting (45 mentions)
2. Client presentations (23 mentions)
3. Executive dashboards (18 mentions)
4. Billing reconciliation (12 mentions)
Business Impact Reported:
- 8 users reported customer-facing impact
- 3 users reported missed deadlines
- 2 users reported financial impact
Communication Rating:
Avg: 3.8/5 (up from 3.2 in last incident)
Most requested: Earlier ETA communication
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Pattern Detection Across Incidents
Track incident feedback over time:
const analyzeIncidentPatterns = async (incidents) => {
return {
// Impact trends
averageSeverity: calculateTrend(incidents, 'avgSeverity'),
averageAffectedUsers: calculateTrend(incidents, 'affectedUsers'),
// Communication effectiveness
communicationRating: calculateTrend(incidents, 'commRating'),
mostRequestedImprovements: aggregateRequests(incidents),
// Recovery
averageFeedbackSubmissionRate: calculateAvg(incidents, 'feedbackRate'),
postIncidentNPSChange: calculateNPSImpact(incidents),
};
};
Closing the Loop
Users who provide incident feedback deserve follow-up.
Post-Incident Report
Share findings with affected users:
## Post-Incident Report: Dashboard Outage - January 13, 2026
### Summary
On January 13, our dashboard was unavailable for 47 minutes due to
a database connection pool exhaustion. This affected 2,340 users.
### What Happened
- 2:34 PM: Monitoring detected elevated error rates
- 2:38 PM: On-call engineer paged
- 2:45 PM: Root cause identified (connection pool)
- 3:15 PM: Fix deployed
- 3:21 PM: Full recovery confirmed
### Impact (from your feedback)
127 users shared feedback:
- 27% reported blocking impact
- 45 users were affected during end-of-day reporting
- 8 users reported customer-facing impact
We apologize for the disruption, especially to those
running end-of-day reports.
### What We're Doing
1. **Immediate**: Added connection pool monitoring and alerting
2. **This week**: Implementing automatic pool scaling
3. **This month**: Reviewing all database connection patterns
4. **Ongoing**: Improving ETA communication (your top request)
### Communication Improvements
Your feedback asked for earlier ETA estimates. We're updating
our runbook to provide preliminary ETAs within 10 minutes
of incident declaration.
Thank you for helping us improve.
Individual Follow-Up
For high-severity reporters:
Subject: Following up on incident impact
Hi [Name],
You reported significant impact from our January 13 outage,
noting that you missed a client presentation deadline.
I wanted to follow up personally:
1. Were you able to reschedule the presentation?
2. Is there anything we can do to help?
3. Would advance warning of maintenance windows help
you avoid similar conflicts?
We take reliability seriously, and your feedback directly
influenced our improvement priorities.
- [Name], Customer Success
Track Post-Incident Sentiment
Measure relationship recovery:
const measureIncidentRecovery = async (incident) => {
const affectedUsers = incident.reporters;
return {
// 7-day post-incident NPS
nps7Day: await getNPS(affectedUsers, { daysAfter: 7 }),
// Compare to pre-incident
npsChange: await compareNPS(affectedUsers, incident.date),
// Churn tracking
churnRate30Day: await getChurnRate(affectedUsers, { daysAfter: 30 }),
expectedChurnRate: await getBaselineChurn(affectedUsers),
// Engagement
loginRate7Day: await getLoginRate(affectedUsers, { daysAfter: 7 }),
loginRateBaseline: await getBaselineLoginRate(affectedUsers),
};
};
Proactive Incident Communication
Don't wait for users to find out.
Proactive Notification
Notify before users notice:
const incidentNotificationStrategy = {
severity1: { // Critical
channels: ['status_page', 'in_app_banner', 'email', 'sms'],
timing: 'immediate',
updates: 'every_15_minutes',
},
severity2: { // Major
channels: ['status_page', 'in_app_banner', 'email'],
timing: 'immediate',
updates: 'every_30_minutes',
},
severity3: { // Minor
channels: ['status_page', 'in_app_banner'],
timing: 'within_10_minutes',
updates: 'on_change',
},
severity4: { // Cosmetic
channels: ['status_page'],
timing: 'best_effort',
updates: 'on_resolution',
},
};
Preemptive Feedback Collection
For planned maintenance:
Upcoming Maintenance - January 20, 2-4 AM EST
We're upgrading our database infrastructure to improve
performance and reliability.
Expected impact: Brief intermittent slowness
Expected duration: 2 hours
Help us schedule better:
Does this maintenance window work for you?
[Yes] [No, I typically work during these hours]
If this timing is problematic:
What time would work better? [Dropdown: time options]
Why is this time problematic? [Text field]
[Submit preferences]
Building Incident Resilience
Use feedback to prevent future incidents.
Feedback-Driven Reliability Investments
Prioritize based on incident impact:
| Improvement | Incident Feedback Support | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Faster failover | 45 mentions of duration | P0 |
| Better status updates | 38 mentions | P1 |
| SMS notifications | 32 requests | P2 |
| Workaround suggestions | 28 requests | P2 |
| Mobile status page | 12 requests | P3 |
Reliability Dashboard
Track reliability metrics alongside feedback:
Reliability + Feedback Dashboard - Q4 2025
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Uptime: 99.94% (target: 99.9%)
Incidents: 3 (down from 5 in Q3)
Mean Time to Recovery: 34 min (down from 52 min)
User Feedback During Incidents:
Response rate: 12% of affected users (up from 8%)
Avg communication rating: 4.1/5 (up from 3.4/5)
Blocking impact rate: 23% (down from 31%)
Post-Incident Recovery:
NPS change: -2 points (improved from -8 points)
30-day churn: 1.2% (baseline: 1.1%)
Re-engagement rate: 94%
Top User Request: Earlier ETA communication
Status: Implemented in December
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Key Takeaways
-
Incidents reveal truth: Users articulate true priorities, hidden dependencies, and critical workflows during outages.
-
Collect in phases: During incident (quick impact), immediately after (detailed impact), and 24-72 hours later (reflection).
-
Keep it brief during crisis: One-click impact reporting during active incidents; save detailed surveys for after resolution.
-
Aggregate and share findings: Summarize impact across all feedback and share publicly in post-incident reports.
-
Close the loop: Follow up personally with high-severity reporters; share what you're doing to prevent recurrence.
-
Track relationship recovery: Monitor NPS, churn, and engagement after incidents to measure trust impact.
-
Turn feedback into reliability: Use incident feedback themes to prioritize infrastructure investments and communication improvements.
User Vibes OS integrates with incident management tools to collect and analyze feedback during service disruptions. Learn more.
Related Articles
Feedback for Developer Tools: Unique Challenges of Collecting from Technical Users
Developers hate surveys but love fixing problems. Learn how to collect actionable feedback from technical users through GitHub issues, API logs, and community channels.
Feature Flags Meet Feedback: Validating Releases with Real User Signals
Learn how to pair feature flag rollouts with targeted feedback collection to measure impact and catch regressions before full deployment.
The Feedback-to-Feature Pipeline: From Raw Input to Shipped Code
End-to-end workflow from feedback collection through prioritization, specification, development, and closing the loop with users who requested features.
Written by User Vibes OS Team
Published on January 13, 2026